Ethereum Miner and Developer War Escalates, But We’re Not Overpaying For Network Security On A Transactional Basis

Ethereum Miner and Developer War Escalates, But We’re Not Overpaying For Network Security On A Transactional Basis

Overview

 

We attended Ethereum’s core developer call last week, various Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) were discussed which aim to change the reward given to miners for mining blocks in Ethereum and securing the network.

 

This debate is causing a major battle between developers and miners and we detail these argument points with our opinions below. This debate is undoubtedly weighing on Ethereum’s price since if miners leave and the network is unsecure it could be open to attacks that threaten its entire value, but if inflation is too high and we delay the move to proof-of-stake by keeping miners happy with high rewards, then Ethereum doesn’t have a future.

 

We also introduce a new metric that compares the money paid to miners per transaction on Bitcoin and Ethereum for network security which denotes Ethereum is not overpaying for security vs Bitcoin on a transactional basis.

 

We ultimately believe EIP-858 should and will be adopted as despite under-paying per transaction vs Bitcoin, we are overpaying for network security on a pay-out ratio method. This is since Etheruem’s market cap is well below Bitcoins.  For investors, we believe after a viable EIP is adopted, slated for late October 2018, that lowers the block reward and the network is demonstrated as still secure, the end of this war will lead to an increase in ETH’s price above current levels.

 

Also, with EIP-858 we believe miners won’t leave and network security will be fine and it’s a runway to Ethereum’s mining free future; Proof-of-Stake. The Ethereum contends inflation is too high, and we believe EIP-858 pulls the band-aid off and lowers inflation and positions the network for the transition to proof-of-stake.

 

The Ethereum community has four reasons to lower the block reward (inflation) that we analyze in this report.

 

  • Inflation is higher than Bitcoin, and supply wasn’t supposed to cross 100M for a century.
  • We are overpaying for network security – in part, not according to our new metric.
  • Network security is safe – last time the block reward was lowered the network was fine.
  • It’s a runway to the future of proof-of-stake

Subscribe To View The Rest Of This Report

Choose from a monthly or annual subscription (save over 15%).

Consumer

$250/ year
  • Extensive Research Reports
  • Access to Full Content Library
  • No Calls, Emails or Meetings with Analysts

  • Podcast Transcriptions
MONTHLY SIGN UPANNUAL SIGN UP

 

 

  • Additional Disclosures:
  • 51percent is not a FINRA registered broker-dealer or investment adviser and does not provide investment banking services
  • The author did not accept fees, stock or other compensation for preparing this research report. The only fees 51percent earns is through paying subscribers to 51percent, the companies (or entities, since networks or protocols are not all companies) themselves do not compensate 51percent.
  • 51percent was not hired by the covered entity/company to prepare the report.
  • 51percent and its authors will not receive compensation from the entities covered in this report for non-report services such as presenting at author sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases or other ancillary services.
  • The covered entities in this report are not required to engage with 51percent regarding any non-report related services.
  • The entities covered in this report have not previously paid the author in cash or in stock for any research reports or non-report related services
  • Compensation is not received on any basis (fixed or contingent on positive opinions in this report) since 51percent is only compensated by paying subscribers to 51pct.io and not the companies or entities mentioned.
  • The author, Tom Shaughnessy, owns tokens in Ethereum, MakerDAO, 0x Protocol, HYDRO, Civic, Polymath and Gladius. These are subject to change.
  • This report belongs to the author, not any entities mentioned in this report.
  • This report is based on publicly available information about the entities covered, and the authors consider them to be accurate and reliable. 
  • The report is disseminated primarily electronically and is made available to everyone at the same time.
  • This report is not investment advice, it is strictly informational. Do not trade or invest in any tokens, companies or entities based upon this information.
(1) Comments

Leave a Reply